An Ideal Taxonomic System is Not Easy to Develop Because

Synonyms

Definition/Introduction

Among early modern naturalists, "systems of nature" are the methods used by naturalists to classify living beings. Taxonomy, a word coined only in 1813 by de Candolle, refers to the classes or taxa that are obtained by applying one or another method of classification. In order to illustrate their variety, some such methods are presented in section "The Variety of Systems." The following sections explain the difference between natural and artificial systems (section "Artificial and Natural Systems") and summarize contemporary debates on early modern taxonomy and essentialism (section "Essentialism"). Early modern taxonomists are indeed not the only humans to classify natural beings (section "The Classificatory Mind"). What however could be the specificity of their activity? That question is addressed in sections "The Lack of a Communal Experience," "Abstraction from the...

Related Topics

  • Botany
  • Zoology

References

  • Atran S (1990) Cognitive foundations of natural history: towards an anthropology of science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar

  • Berlin B (1992) Ethnobiological classification: principles of categorization of plants and animals in traditional societies. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Cook A (2010) Linnaeus and Chinese plants: a test of the linguistic imperialism thesis. Notes Rec R Soc 64:121–138

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Daston L (2004) Type specimens and scientific memory. Crit Inq 31:153–182

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Earle R (2016) The pleasures of taxonomy: Casta paintings, classification, and colonialism. William Mary Q 73:427–466

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Ellen R (2017) Categorizing natural objects: some issues arising from recent work in cognitive anthropology and ethnobiological classification. In: Pommerening T, Bisang W (eds) Classification from antiquity to modern times: sources, methods, and theories from an interdisciplinary perspective. Gruyter, Berlin, pp 263–277

    Google Scholar

  • Funk H (2014) Describing plants in a new mode: the introduction of dichotomies into sixteenth-century botanical literature. Arch Nat Hist 41:100–112

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Goody J (1977) The domestication of the savage mind. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar

  • Harrison P (2009) Linnaeus as a second Adam? Taxonomy and the religious vocation. Zygon 44:879–893

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Hoquet T (2014) Biologization of race and racialization of the human: Bernier, Buffon, Linnaeus. In: Bancel N, David T, Thomas DRD (eds) The invention of race: scientific and popular representations. Routledge, New York, pp 17–32

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Hull DL (1965) The effect of essentialism on taxonomy–two thousand years of stasis (I). Br J Philos Sci 15:314–326

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Latour B (1988) Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar

  • Laudan R (1989) Individuals, species and the development of mineralogy and geology. In: Ruse M (ed) What the philosophy of biology is. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 221–233

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Margócsy D (2014) Commercial visions: science, trade, and visual culture in the Dutch Golden Age. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • McClellan JE, Regourd F (2000) The colonial machine: French science and colonization in the ancien regime. Osiris 15:31–50

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Müller-Wille S (2013) Systems and how Linnaeus looked at them in retrospect. Ann Sci 70:305–317

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Müller-Wille S, Charmantier I (2012) Natural history and information overload: the case of Linnaeus. Stud Hist Philos Sci Part C Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 43:4–15

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Needham J (1986) Science and civilisation in China, vol 6, part 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar

  • Ogilvie BW (2003) The many books of nature: renaissance naturalists and information overload. J Hist Ideas 64:29

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Richards RA (2016) Biological classification: a philosophical introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Romero A (2012) When whales became mammals: the scientific journey of cetaceans from fish to mammals in the history of science. In: Romero A, Keith E (eds) New approaches to the study of marine mammal. Intech, London, pp 3–30

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Schiebinger L (1993) Why mammals are called mammals: gender politics in eighteenth-century natural history. Am Hist Rev 98:382–411

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Schiebinger L, Swan C (eds) (2007) Colonial botany: science, commerce, and politics in the early modern world. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar

  • Sloan PR (1972) John Locke, John Ray, and the problem of the natural system. J Hist Biol 5:1–53

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Sloan PR (1976) The Buffon-Linnaeus controversy. Isis 67:356–375

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Smith JEH (2015) Nature, human nature, and human difference: race in early modern philosophy. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Winsor MP (2003) Non-essentialist methods in pre-Darwinian taxonomy. Biol Philos 18:387–400

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thibault De Meyer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

De Meyer, T. (2020). Nature and Taxonomy, Systems of. In: Jalobeanu, D., Wolfe, C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Early Modern Philosophy and the Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20791-9_157-1

Download citation

  • .RIS
  • .ENW
  • .BIB
  • DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20791-9_157-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20791-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20791-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and Philosophy Reference Module Humanities and Social Sciences

trentsaidence.blogspot.com

Source: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-20791-9_157-1

0 Response to "An Ideal Taxonomic System is Not Easy to Develop Because"

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel